Thursday, August 29, 2024

The Best Norwegian Pilsner: A Bracket Taste-off

 


Norway has a long history of beer brewing. The Gullatingloven of 900 actually required farmers to produce a certain amount of ale for Christmas celebrations. Things are different now, and despite a growing homebrew culture, blossoming microbrew scene, and old school farmers still producing exciting ales using heritage yeast strains, the beer world is dominated by the almighty pilsner.

Pilsner came early to Norway. It was a style invented in Bohemia in 1842 using lightly kilned pilsner malts (hence the name), soft water, and a snappy hit from the floral saaz hops. It’s a very narrow style that has been adulterated and, in my opinion, ruined by the rise of the European and American light lager styles. They are often called pilsners, but lack that rich malty base and biting balance of hops. Instead, we are left with quickly-fermented watery crap.

I feel that microbreweries don’t fully understand the style either. We are getting thicker heavier malt bills with exciting adjuncts and creative hops. These are tasty beers, to be fair, but they aren’t necessarily pilsners.

Anyway, we’re getting off topic. Pilsner came to Norway, and a lot of the industrial breweries that popped up in the mid-1800s added it to their lineup. In 1901, the various major breweries joined together to form the Bryggeriforegning (the brewers league) to help stop the race to the bottom with prices. They divided the country up into 6 regions to create local monopolies. From this period on, Norway saw a significant shrinking of the number of breweries in the country, as the markets condensed a few big player bought a ton of the smaller breweries. During the era of the “beer cartels”, no new breweries were started.

Despite being absolved in 1989, this agreement continues to influence the drinking practices of Nowegians today. Residents of the various Norwegian cites are passionately supportive of their local beer. To the point where they will choose to go to another restaurant if their brand isn’t on tap. Yet, very few people in Norway know how much of their beer preferences were dictated by a back-door deal to keep prices artificially high. The dissolution of the monopolies has been followed by aggressive expansion by two of the biggest beer brands, Bergen’s Hansa and Oslo’s Ringes, both of which have been bought up by Unibrew and Carlsberg respectively. We see them offering cheap tap handles and good deals in their competing markets, making Ringes almost more common than Hansa in its hometown. A good number of the classic local brands, including Tou, Schous, Arendals, CB, Nordlands, Dahls, and a handful of microbrews are made by these two companies.

If you go to most larger supermarkets, you can find most of the legacy brands, but a variety of others including newer microbrews and microbrew special varieties to rope in craft beer fans. The selection is dizzying, and most people just stick doggedly to their local brand.

So, a couple beer loving friends and I set out to taste our way through the most commonly available Norwegian pilsners that cost less than 100kr per liter. Note: a lot of these beers are not technically pilsners, but European light lagers.

 

The Panel

Our panel was made up of three people from three different countries. I am an American craft beer lover, homebrewer, and certified beer sommelier with a passionate love for Belgian styles. Another was a Swede with a long history of drinking “normal” beers but is a taste explorer who list Saison Dupont among his favorites. The last member is an old-school Bergenser and Hansa lover, who is particularly fond of IPAs. None of us are experts per se. Despite my education, I am out of practice in formal tasting. Still, this isn’t aimed at experts, but the average consumer of beer in Norway. In this way, we were more than qualified.

 

The selection process

My original goal was to buy in the six regional giants and fill in with some popular craft beers to get a good panel. In the end, my selection process was no more complicated than going to a couple larger local shops and buying all the Norwegian-brewed pilsners I could find.

In the end, I found 19 beers. With only one, Ægir Fotballfeber Kamppils, which technically did fit my original criteria of costing under 100kr/L.

 

The tasting process

This taste test followed the same procedure as my earlier Hungarian beer tasting challenge. The 19 beers were whittled down to 16, which would compete in a head-to-head tournament-style taste-off. We blind-tasted (sort of) two beers against each other in identical wine glasses, with our favorite moving on. Due to the odd number of tasters, no tiebreaking was necessary.

The blinding process was done through the use of opaque paper bags, but due to some difficulty with pouring, we became a lot more lax with the blinding technique as the contest moved into further rounds. Also, since the most generic tasting of the group got weeded out in the first round, it was somewhat easy to differentiate the beers later in the competition.

The beers were roughly divided into geographical regions: Oslo, West, North, and South/East. I understand that Trondheim is not technically North, and pedants will likely find issues if they look for them. I explored many ways to divide the beers into four groups of four, and this is the only one that I could get to fit.

The first-round matchups were done using “seeds”, which is a system used by the NCAA for their tournaments. In each heat, the top-rated beer takes on the lowest-rated beer, and the two in the middle face off each other. The rating was determined by their global Untappd score, which are listed beside the beers later in this blog.

We chose to do the drink-off in august to capitalize on prime pilsner-weather. Unfortunately, Bergen has suffered its wettest August in recorded history, so we had to do this on a cold 10 degree day with constant downpour of rain.

The lovely Bergen pilsner weather


The beers

Drink-in beers:

Because I bought more than 16 beers, we had to weed some out. I bought three beers from Aass brewery, two from Mack, and two from Hansa. Since Mack marketed their two pilsners under two separate brands and because we had fewer beers from north of Møre og Romsdal, both Mack selections stayed in the game.

 

Hansa vs. Hansa premium

For those with lighter pockets, our panel unanimously selected plain old green Hansa over the more expensive premium version, but it was close. The premium was more cleanly brewed, and had a lovely malty aroma, but the taste was a bit too sweet and lacked that snappy hop bitterness to make it refreshing. Regular Hansa had a touch of sulphur, but also a whiff of hops. Despite its sharper yeast profile (probably due to higher temperature fermentation to rush it our faster), it had a long hop aftertaste and fuller, more pleasant flavor. This was a close match, though. Either way, Hansa did not bring it. Sorry, Bergen.

 

Aass Halling vs. Aass Pilsner vs Anker Pils

These brothers from the same brewery were very close. In the end, the nearly zero-bitterness Halling was just too thin and watery to get a place in our contest, despite it’s bright maltiness with a touch of wheat. Anker lost out, in part, because it was only available in 330ml, which isn’t enough to last the whole contest. It was hoppier than the original Pilsner. In the end, we were all surprised by the quality of Aass’s offerings.

 

West Division:

7Fjell Pilsner (3.26) vs. Hansa (2.94), Ægir Fotballfeber Kamppils (3.07) vs. Lervig Pilsner (3.23)

This round had the highest average scores of all the regions, mainly because three of the four selections were microbrews, which usually score higher on untappd. Our panel generally agreed with the score and rated this region as the best. Take this with a grain of salt as all of us live in West Norway.

7Fjell edged out it’s Bergen rival Hansa, with two out of three of us picking 7fjell. The odd man out says it confirmed his bias that “just doesn’t like 7fjell”. I had to disagree harshly, finding 7Fjell the far superior of the two. Hansa was boring in comparison. I won’t call it bad pilsner. It has what your want, a light toasty malt flavor with a bit of hops. Easy drinking. A bit hoppier than a lot of lighter lagers, but it was amateurish in comparison to 7fjell. It’s microbrew cousin displayed what a Bohemian pilsner should be. It was dry, but still malty. Hoppy, but not bitter. It went down smoothly with a clear balance of flavors. The aroma was a beautiful hit of biscuity malts and the classic floral saaz hops. Now, this was a panel rating these beers, but honestly, this was my personal favorite of the contest.

Both Lervig and Ægir offered very good beers. Lervig was another beer with a focus on balancing the bitterness with sweetness. It was a bit fruity on the nose, being among the yeastier aroma profiles of the contest, but didn’t have the sulfuric hit you get from some German pilsners. It was a lovely pilsner. The Ægir was marginally worse. It was more bitter and had an off-putting touch of acidity. Still, I was outvoted by the rest of the panel who picked Ægir.

Of these two beloved regional microbreweries, the panel went for 7Fjell. The off vote was again our 7Fjell-disliking friend. It’s ok. People have the right to be wrong.

 

“North” Division:

Austmann (3.22) vs. Mack Isbjørn (2.95), Dahls (3.13) vs. Mack Pilsner (2.98)

For our first matchup, we were all surprised by how close it was. Austmann is another respected microbrewery (technically owned by Hansa), and Isbjørn is Mack’s budget pilsner. Both had a yeasty off-smell, but the Isbjørn smelled like a warmer fermentation. Austmann had a bright floral, hoppy flavor that was very clear. In contrast, Isbjørn was malty and toasty with a bit of fruitiness that you don’t really expect (or want from a pilsner). For my money, Austmann is the better beer, but neither blew me away. The panel agreed with me here.

Dahls and Mack were also evenly matched. Mack was a bit drier, but had a bit of alcohol on the nose, which you shouldn’t have for such a weak beer. Dahls was rich and full, with a lovely malty aroma and flavor, with a touch of fruitiness and snappy hop finish. This was a pleasant addition to the flavor, that fit in much better than the similar tones from Isbjørn. The fruitiness comes from their local yeast strain. Both are good pilsners for their price, but Dahls moved on.

Dahls won its matchup with Austmann, winning the North division. This was surprise win for this macro. Here’s a crazy fact: Dahls was picked as Europe’s best pilsner in 2023 and has won other Norwegian beer taste tests. It may not have a strong reputation here in Norway, but it’s a well-respected beer both domestically and internationally. Who knows, maybe their strong relationship with Garret Oliver of Brooklyn Breweries has paid off in improvements to their production technique.

 

Oslo division

Schous (3.25) vs. Arendals (3.06), Frydenlunds (3.09) vs. Ringnes (2.7)

This division features four beers made at one single brewery: Ringnes. All are separate brands eaten up by Carlsberg.

Schous is having a moment as a hipster beer, in part, because of its original location with its iconic façade as one enters Grünerløkka, Oslo’s trendy, gentrification hotspot. Still, don’t be fooled, this beer has nothing to do with old institutional brewery. It’s made at Ringnes. My Oslo friends swear by this beer, but the one time I had it in a pub overlooking the old brewery itself, I was not impressed. I guess I was wrong that night. Schous had a floral hop aroma, bordering on perfumy, but still wasn’t overbearing. It made me feel like a stroll in a wild field after a summer rain. It had a bright, hoppy flavor, but stayed balanced. I wrote bright three times in my notes, so I guess it’s a bright beer. Arendals Pilsner was much better than expected. It’s not a beer you see often, at least not in Bergen. It was balanced with a bready flavor. Still, we all agreed that Schous was the best choice here.

Frydenlund was better than Ringnes, but this is just common knowledge. Both had a nice biscuity aroma, but Frydenlund was a touch more hop-driven.

All three of us tend to order Frydenlund if we’re looking for a pilsner out on town. Despite this, all of us chose Schous as the superior beer.

 

East/South division:

Nøgne Ø premium Pilsner (3.41) vs. Seidel (2.3), Aass Pilsner (3.11) vs. CB (2.97)

For the first round, we see the highest rated beer of the contest versus the lowest. It was clear why. Seidel was awful. It was slightly sour, sharp, boozy with a off-putting dirty fermentation character. There was a non-disgusting aroma with some nice toasty malts and the slightest hint of hops, but it tasted horrible. In contrast, Nøgne Ø’s selection was hoppy and bright with a balanced flavor, and a lovely clean hoppy aroma. It was far superior, and easily one of the best beers of the contest.

I’m sorry Kristiansand, but your beloved local beer is among the worst in the country. Aass was just much cleaner. CB was just warm-fermented, dirty, disgust cheap lager. Just a terrible beer.

The match up between Aass and Nøgne Ø was the hardest, and most controversial of the whole contest. Two out of three of us agreed that the Nøgne Ø was better beer of the two. It was not, however, the best PILSNER. Nøgne’s premium lager was just too rich and heavy to be the best pilsner. Why does one drink pilsner? To have multiple, refreshing, thirst-quenching drink with a snappy finish. Aass succeeded in this respect, but Nøgne Ø was not a drinkable or refreshing. We picked the inferior beer as the winner. Deal with it.

 

The later rounds:

As we’ve already had the scant tasting notes (that got less detailed as we got deeper into our 20 beers), we’ll quickly go through the rest of the contest.

The author feels that 7fjell was better than Dahls, but my partners both liked Trondheim’s local, for similar reasons for our elimination of Nøgne Ø. This was a democratic contest after all. I cannot fault Dahls, though. Schous won handily against Aass. Again, we didn’t think Aass was particularly good, but it was fine. As one of the cheapest beers in the contest, it had a good showing. Still, we could not resist Schous’s floral punch, which even edged out Dahls for the overall winner as Norway’s best supermarket pilsner for under 100nok/L.


The benchmark test

Sure, Schous is the best Norwegian pilsner, but if you look at our supermarket shelves, there’s a ton of international for similar prices. Now, if we were to include them all, this would become a sloppy night, but one beer stands above all over pilsners: Pilsner Urquell. It even won our Hungarian supermarket light lager contest a few years ago.

As much as we liked Schous, two of three of us preferred the classic Bohemian pilsner. It’s right and malty with that cutting bitterness of the herbal and floral Saaz hops. It’s a clear beer that gets that bit extra from their aging process. How could Schous stand a chance?

 

The big question:

The question on most people’s mind though is which is best Ringnes or Hansa, the big rivalry in Norway. Fret not Bergenites, we chose Hansa in our blind taste test between the two, but they were similar, and neither were great. No bragging rights to any of you.

 

The Bracket:



 

TL:DR

After tasting 19 of the best pilsners Norway had to offer, we’ve decided that Schous is the country’s best. Still, it doesn’t hold a candle to Pilsner Urquell. That said, there are some quality pilsners to be found at your local supermarket.

The best Norwegian pilsners we found are:

Schous, Dahls, 7Fjell, Mack, and Nøgne Ø Premium Lager

The worst beers in the country that should be avoided at all costs:
Seidel, CB, and Ringnes

Best deals, quality beers for its price:

Lervig, Frydenlund, Aass, and Dahls




Thursday, March 29, 2018

The Great Hungarian Beer Bracket - Cheap Beer Edition


Photo by Giovanni Gonzales

Why the hell would I do this?

As you know, I am a great advocate for craft beer. I've been brewing for years and love drinking as many artisnal products as I can. I believe that if you are going to drink something that's bad for you, it should taste good. Now, it is becoming easier and easier to have discerning tastes. Nary a bar exists in the States that would dare NOT have at least some IPA on top. Long gone are the days when one would be forced to drink a Miller Lite out of lack of choice.

This said, cheap industrial lager does have its place in the world. For one, a lot of people love them. They make up roughly 90% of the worldwide beer consumption and there must be a reason for this. Even in the days of craft, there are a fair few people who think many of these “snobby” styles don't taste good at all. Not everyone likes bitter beer. Not everyone likes hops. Some see high alcohol as a ruiner of what should be a refreshing, easy-to-drink beverage. And sour beer? That's enough to make many run.

As for myself, I currently live in Budapest, earn Hungary wages, and frankly, cannot afford to drink craft beer all the time. Living in Norway with a good pay check or the USA with craft beer costing between one and two dollars, I could vow to never drink a crap-lager again. But in Hungary, things are different. Even the most ardent lovers of craft drink cheap lager.

Craft has become a real force in the city and the breweries have finally got their act together and lay down a consistent product. The sad thing is, they are all relatively small and are not able to save cost in scale. Plus, they need to purchase most ingredients from abroad at the same price point as the more affluent countries in Europe. So what you get is an expensive product in a poor country. The average craft beer costs about 3.00 euro, but most people only make less than 10 euro an hour. This makes it a price prohibitive beverage.

A typical mass-lager costs between .70 and 1.00 euro, a good third of the price of craft. Plus, many bars (due to restrictive contracts with these major breweries) don't even carry craft beers. When I choose I bar, I make sure that I only support independent bars with a good selection of local craft beers, but I don't always choose the bar.

Industrial lager usually doesn't taste bad. It tastes of basically nothing. I think that many of these beers are acceptable. I prefer a macro-lager to most spirits. Beer is good. I've jumped around a bit in my preferred brand. I've been a Dreher guy off and on. In my first stint here, I drank mostly Kozel from Czech. If I see Staropramen for a good price, I'll often grab a bottle (though it is brewed here at Borsodi brewery and pales in comparison to the real thing.) The real find is when Pilsner Urquell pops up for under 300huf.

What I wanted to find is: is there a significant difference between the typical brands of cheap lager in Hungary? Is it worth it to pay 300huf for a Pilsner Urquell when I can pay 150huf for a Rocky Cellar?

So, in recognition of March Madness, my buddy Giovanni and I devised the great Hungarian Beer Bracket. Due to lack of participants (it was just Gio and I, sadly), we limited our field to 16 beers. 32 would be much better as we could work in such popular international beers like Becks, Heineken, and Tuborg.

The Planning

I went to the store and listed all the beers that cost under 300huf. From that list, we got 18 Hungarian beers, a good handful of Germans, a few Austrian, Czech, and a Slovakian beer. A few beers got the axe because they are only masquerading as the real thing and are actually poorer quality versions brewed for the Hungarian market (why, oh, why Hofbrau and Spaten would you allow your names on these terrible beers?). We felt that some are just too international and didn't fit into the whole concept, so we took away the aforementioned Becks, Tuborg, and Heineken (even though the latter is actually brewed under contract in Hungary).

We were left with 19 beers. To pare it down to 16, we had three play-in spots. We were able to divide most of the beers into four clear categories with only two that fell outside of the concept. The first group was the Bargain Region, for beers under 200huf (Rocky Cellar, Rákoczi, Kőbányai, Arány Fácán, and Löwenbrau). Next, there was the Classic Region that features the four main Hungarian beers found in most bars, comparable to Coors, Miller, Bud in America (Dreher, Borsodi, Arany Aszok, and Soproni). Most of these brands have a special brands as well, so these formed the Specialty Region (Dreher Hideg Komlos, Arany Aszok Frissensürt, and Soproni 1895). There were two beers we could not easily find homes for, Szalon and Pécsi Premium Lager, so they faced off for the fourth seed in the Speicialty Region. Finally, we had the foreign invaders. Staropramen and Pilsner Urquell are as ubiquitous here as any of the main Hungarian brands. We filled out the Foreign Region with the common Kozel and had a play-in between the two main Austrian beers here: Ottakringer and Steffl.

To determine our seeding, we simply used their Untappd scores (Ratebeer would be extremely unhelpful as it is very lagerist and partially owned by Inbev...it's dead to me.). And so, the Great Hungarian Beer Bracket was born!

Tasting Logistics

The set up was simple. It was single elimination tournament. Two beers go head to head, we taste, rate, and pick the one we liked best. If we disagreed, then we averaged our scores to find the winner.

The beers were tasted from two identical wine glasses. On the bottom of each was a post it with a tiny “A” or “B”. After pouring, we would mix up the two glasses, play with the dog a bit, then mix it some more. For the most part, this masked the identity of the beers. Only a few had a different color.

We both did extensive tasting notes for each beer, but I won't be sharing them here. In general they were all quite low in flavor and were brewed with 100% pilsner malt (some adjuncts in a few of them) and Saaz hops.

Region 1: Bargain Region (Rocky Cellar/Rákoczi vs. Löwenbrau, Kőbányai vs. Arány Fácán)

We figured it was wise to start with the “worst” beers. Just so they could taste fine comparatively. It was a wise choice. From the start, Rocky Cellar was a clear loser. It was the worst beer I've ever tasted (actually no, Black Label and Steel Reserve are still the bottom). Rákoczi actually tasted good in comparison. However, when stacked again Löwenbrau, it was no contest. It is amazing how much comparison brings out the flavor of things. Rákoczi tasted good when compared to Rocky Cellar, but when drank with Löwenbrau, we were both compelled to spit it out. We actually disagreed between Kőbányai and Arány Fácán. However, both were absolutely terrible. Arány Fácán was hoppier and watery, but had a horrible poo-like aroma (Gio described it as vomit-smelling). Kőbányai actually had a pleasant malty aroma with some nice toast and corn. However, it was a bit sour with an unpleasant off-taste. In the end, we let Kőbányai move forward to the next round. It was no contest. Löwenbrau was easily the best beer under 200huf. We dumped the rest down the sink without hesitation.
Winner: Löwenbrau

The Classic Region (Dreher vs. Arany Aszok, Borsodi vs. Soproni)

We chose to do the classics next. These beers were all the same style as in the budget round, so the shift wouldn't be jarring. Yet, it was jarring!

Even in initial pours of Borsodi vs. Soproni, it was clear that we were jumping up in quality. Gone was the excessive DMS and booziness that characterized all of the previous round (I could not believe that 4% beers could smell boozy). Now, I'm not saying that these were good beers. The comparisson was reflected in our scores, which went up a few points from the bargain round, but they moderated quickly.

Borsodi was richer and heavier with a nice malty aroma. Soproni was light and easy-drinking, but it did have an off-taste. We had a hard time picking this one. I picked Borsodi and Gio picked Soproni. We tasted both against each other a few times (non-blind) and eventually decided to go with Borsodi. We both found Soproni to be more pleasant, but it wasn't a clean beer. Borsodi was a better product.

For Dreher vs. Arany Aszok, one of the two had a lovely, floral aroma that was so clear and lovely, I could whiff at it for a long time. It was clearly the best smelling beer we'd had at that point. The other was boring and had clear off-flavors. It was Arany Aszok.

The final battle between Borsodi and Dreher was no contest. Dreher smelled delicious and tasted delicious. Borsodi was merely drinkable.
Winner: Dreher

Specialty Region (Szalon/Pécsi Premium lager vs. Soproni 1895, Dreher Hideg Komlos vs. Arany Aszok Frissensürt)

Despite dumping the vast majority of the beer at this point, we were already feeling a bit woozy. So we took the dog to the park to clear our heads and taste buds. We returned ready to go.

Pécsi Premium Lager was exceptionally better than Szalon. However, I must say that Szalon, at 199huf, is an good budget buy. It did have some off-tastes, was a bit sour, but it was better than everything in our budget round.

For the first main taste-off, Soproni 1895 Premium took on Pécsi Premium Lager. Both beers were fine enough. It was a bit tough, as they were different style beers (Pécsi was bordering on a Vienna Lager color, whereas 1895 was just a typical light lager). In the end, we gave the win to Péci Premium. As we started tasting multiple beers from the same brewery, the yeast character became more obvious. There is something bad about the beers from Soproni. All their brands have the same not-pleasant, burnt-hair aroma and a bad edge. I was not impressed by any of their offerings.

I think it's a bit unfair for any beer that had to face Dreher Hideg Komlos. Basically, it's Dreher, but dry-hopped with Citra. It's a cheater hop. Everything it touches becomes nice and fruity and Hideg Komlos was no exception. That said, Frissensürt is a horrible beer. For a can that has a bunch of hop flowers on the label, there was barely a trace of hop aroma or flavor. It was boring garbage.

It was tough to decided between Pécsi Premium Lager and Hideg Komlos. There was no illusions of blindness. Citra is a clear stamp on any beer. I did find that compared to pleasant clean maltiness of Pécsi Premium Lager, Hideg Komlos tasted a bit off and sour. Both Gio and I gave the two beer equal scores. It really was a matter of taste. However, in the end, Hideg Komlos got our final stamp of approval.

We both agree that either beer is well worth their price. I mean, they're not world class or anything, but surely good buys if you want to drink on the cheap.
Winner: Dreher Hideg Komlos

Foreign Region (Ottakringer/Steffl vs. Staropramen, Pilsner Urquell vs. Kozel)

Gio and I were both excited for this one. Not that we didn't know which beer would win. There is a true pillar in that category. Most of the beers in this Region were true pilsners. I won't go on a tirade against the way that word gets flung around so willy-nilly, but the real thing is hard to beat.

For our Austrian play-in, Ottakringer edged out Steffl. For me, the tipping point was the high level of sulphur aroma in the Steffl, which I'm very sensitive to. That said, it still wasn't a great beer. Ottakringer was at least cleanly brewed.

Sadly for Austria, it could not hold its own against Staropramen. Now, this is a matter of taste though. These two beers are different styles. Staropramen is a Czech Pilsner and Ottakringer is a German Pilsner (or maybe a Helles...it wasn't very hoppy). Staropramen was richer, fuller and made Ottakringer come off as boring.

I feel a bit bad for Kozel. It's not a bad beer at all (despite its bit of sulphur), but it had to face Pilsner Urquell, a world-class pilsner. Everything about Pilsner Urquell was better. It had a cleaner malt profile, a richer hop flavor, and a beautiful aroma. It's truly a great beer. Even compared to Staropramen, it was a good step higher in quality.
Winner: Pilsner Urquell

The Final Four (Dreher vs. Löwenbrau, Dreher Hiden Komlos vs. Pilsner Urquell)

Did any of the budget beers have chance against the others? The simple answer is no. Löwenbrau was over it's head. Dreher is a cleanly made beer, with a nice hop aroma. Löwenbrau is the same style, just a lesser version. Plus, it wasn't completely clean. It had a yogurty fruitiness to it which I didn't like.

The citra hops in Hideg Komlos were not enough to take on the original Pilsner. Eariler, Gio and I were delighted by the wonderful brightness and refreshing quality of Hideg Komlos, but Pilsner Urquell is delicious. Hideg Komlos is merely acceptable.

For the final round, we went out and purchased fresh cans of each. Again, compassion will reveal a lot. In the earlier rounds, Dreher was lovely, floral, smooth and tasty. Now, sitting next to beer that just does everything right, it even tasted a bit bad. It wasn't a contest at all. Pilsner Urquell reins supreme.

We did a follow-up tasting to determine true second. Staropramen won out as being better than Dreher. Still, I must say that this competition showed that Dreher isn't that bad of a beer. It's not going to take over the world or anything, but it is a clear choice at most bars in Budapest.
Grand Champion: Pilsner Urquell

Take-away lessons

First off, let me say that I do not recommend doing this. It was far too much tasting. We were both exhausted, buzzed, and by the end, didn't really care much (thankfully, the winners were obvious). If you do a tasting, limit it to a maximum of 10, and even that is a stretch. 20 beers is far too many.

Neither of us were surprised by the results. If we had a done a bracket betting challenge before the tasting, it would have played out exactly how I'd predicted. There was not a single surprise here (except that the Pécsi Premim Lager is a pretty good beer). The only upset of the whole tournament (so the only one that went against the Untappd ratings) was Borsodi over Soproni, and that one was close. Also, the quality lined up with the prices as well (as in the more expensive, the better the beer).

Based on my analysis of scores to price, here are you best bargains:
Dreher, Dreher Hideg Komlos, Steffl, Löwenbrau, Szalon, Staropramen, Pilsner Urquell.

The worst buys:
Soproni 1895, Ottakringer, Frissensürt, Arany Aszok, Rocky Cellar

For me, this really shows the importance of comparison tasting. Rocky Cellar aside, if you only drank the terrible beers, you probably wouldn't find much wrong with them. Yes, these had off-flavors for sure, but they really become obvious when compared to a clean beer. I'm not saying that Arány Fácán will ever taste good, but I can understand how some people could buy it time after time. Sure, if you have a better beer, you'll know it's not good, but after a few days, most people's palates will adjust to the bad taste.

I really wish we had more people on this. I also wish, we'd had some devoted lovers of one of these brands, to see if their preference is more based on packaging and habit than taste.

Still, if you see Pilsner Urquell for under 300 (sometimes it is more), do not hesitate to buy it. It is worth those few extra forint.

All this aside, I don't plan on quitting craft beer anytime soon.

Monday, January 1, 2018

Beer Odalom and a Brief History of Homebrewing in Hungary

Here is another article on Funzine about the small, but charming homebrewing shop, Beer Odalom in Budapest. It also tells a bit of the story of how homebrewing started in Hungary. Check it out.

http://funzine.hu/en/2017/04/11/gastro-highlights-gastro-guide/beer-chronicles-budapest-beerodalom/

Balkezes Brewery: Living the Dream

Check out my Funzine article about Balkezes Brewery out of Budapest. These guys make great hop-forward beers and as of 2017, still held the highest ranked Hungarian beer on Untappd, Grey Joy, an double IPA with earl grey tea and bergamot. (note: I did not take the pictures nor support the choice of photography in this article) 

 http://funzine.hu/en/2017/05/29/goodapest-en-2/balkezes-brewery-living-dream-aaron-troye-white/

A Beneficial Buzz: Drinking for the Greater Good

One of my articles has been published on an online magazine out of Budapest called Funzine. Check out this beer brand that donates all profits to charity.

http://funzine.hu/en/2017/05/02/goodapest-en/a-beneficial-buzz/

Thursday, December 28, 2017

Zanatsko Pivo: Beer Ambassadors of the Balkans


Zanatsko Pivo: Beer Ambassadors of the Balkans


Zanatsko Pivo founders from left to right (Filip Stefanovic, Djordje Andrejevic, and photographer Buki Milijkovic)



As new craft beer scenes emerge in the digital age, brewers and beer lovers both benefit by learning from the mistakes and trials of more-established markets. They have the advantage of starting from scratch, using a winning blueprint to build the infrastructure right, starting from the bottom up.
Two programmers and beer lovers, Filip Stefanovic and Djordje Andrejevic are trying to get things rolling right in Serbia. They founded Zantasko Pivo, a beer lover's resource for everything craft in the Balkans.

It all started for them as it did for many, with a simple IPA. A single sip showed them that there was something beyond the mass-produced light beers that dominate the market.

As their love grew, so did their dissatisfaction with the lack of information about particularly product availability and events. Bars would advertise that they had certain beers on tap, only to find that their menu hadn't been updated in weeks. In the small-market beer world, production is minuscule and taps change over fast. They knew the people of Serbia needed a resource to help people find these new flavors, so they started programming a mobile app that would make it so beer lovers could find their favorite products in Belgrade.

In order to get things rolling immediately, they began the facebook community Zantasko Pivo in April 2017. Within six months, it had grown to 2000+ followers. What started as simple venue to share all the beer information of the area became an obsession that ate all their free time. Each new adventure opened a new door. Craft-related news within in the Balkans was under-reported, so they began traveling around trying to cover every festival and brewery event they could. They've been filming interviews, writing blogs, and tasting everything the region has to offer.

This is an unpaid gig and they intend to keep it this way.

“We're not doing this for money. When the money gets involved it changes things,” says Filip.
Nor are they looking for financiers. This is a labor of love. Over the short life the community, they've already found more like-minded individuals to help out as well. In a way, they aren't even working for the site, but moderating the community, helping beer lovers, brewers, homebrewers, or the curious, find each other.

Their app intends to attack the scene on two fronts. First, it will offer a wealth of information for consumers, led by blogs, videos, interviews, and constantly updated beer news. The second and most interesting feature will be for beer hunters.

It'll compile the features from already popular beer rating sites such as Untappd and Ratebeer. Breweries can add the specifications of the beers, including tasting notes, alcohol content, and IBU levels. Then pubs will be responsible for keeping their product and pricing information up-to-date.
With an interface designed for simplicity, the app will allow businesses to update availability information in seconds. Besides, having inconsistent information could lead to a lack of faith from their customer base. Zantasko Pivo hopes that once the app gains enough steam, pubs won't dare being left behind. The community and app will feed itself.

Fortunately, the languages of the region are very similar, so reaching the whole region will not be handicapped by communication issues. In addition, they plan to make much of the information available in English.

Thing are looking up for the Balkan scene. Dogma brewery in Belgrade is starting to find some minor distribution and festival appearances in Budapest. The booming tourist market in Croatia is having a strong effect on their beer industry as well. Once the app gets rolling, hopefully the interest in Eastern European craft will find a wider audience and they can see the same type of growth as the British or United States markets (at least on a per capita basis). The war against boring beer is heating up every year. It's good to know there are people crafting the weapons to win.

Their online community can be found at https://www.facebook.com/zanatskopivo/